jds SVN: spec-files
Patrick Ale
patrick.ale at gmail.com
Fri Jan 18 11:58:42 PST 2008
On Jan 18, 2008 7:21 PM, Brian Cameron <Brian.Cameron at sun.com> wrote:
>
> Patrick/Damien:
>
> Note that changes to modules that include encryption technologies
> often requires export control review. So, unless there is a real
> need to bump the version of these modules (such as a security fix),
> we should avoid doing so. In other words, if there is just new
> functionality, we shouldn't bump the version unless something in
> GNOME actually needs that new functionality.
>
> Further, it might make sense to wait until these modules are
> transfered to the new team so they can be responsible for doing
> paperwork such as export control.
Hi Brian,
I understand what you're saying regarding the SUNWgnutls
responsibility movement. However, the problem is we didn't bump up
SUNWgnutls but gnome-gtkhtml (SUNWgnome-libs component) which goes bad
on a missing item that should be shipped by SUNWgnutls (damien is
doing some tests I read when I was at the airport, we might have
missed a configure flag).
Nevertheless, just for my understanding. Does this mean that any
package upgrade of any JDS component that depends on a newer version
of $software-with-encryption is blocked until
$software-with-encryption is reviewed? I'd like to know this for
future reference where I might get even more involved with the trunk
build ;)
Enjoy your weekends all!
--
Patrick
More information about the jds-notify
mailing list