[kmf-discuss] Changing the API - pros/cons

Massimiliano Pala pala at cs.dartmouth.edu
Wed Mar 21 19:42:28 PDT 2007


Hi All,

Summarizing my position:
* I am in favor of the PKCS#11 options style. This would simplify my
   work too. So I guess we have a strong agreement on this. Probably
   as the label=parameter style is adopted, we can have a simple function
   that will take care of building the parameters list before sending
   it to the function. This would keep the lib smaller than it is now
   because the data structures are no more needed (*_CONF).

* The "standard" Solaris style sounds reasonable, I vote for this (although
   we have to rewrite all the current software... :( )

Cheers,
Max
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3088 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://oss-beta1.opensolaris.org/pipermail/kmf-discuss/attachments/20070321/7fe8d8d5/attachment.bin 


More information about the kmf-discuss mailing list