[kmf-discuss] Changing the API - pros/cons
Massimiliano Pala
pala at cs.dartmouth.edu
Wed Mar 21 19:42:28 PDT 2007
Hi All,
Summarizing my position:
* I am in favor of the PKCS#11 options style. This would simplify my
work too. So I guess we have a strong agreement on this. Probably
as the label=parameter style is adopted, we can have a simple function
that will take care of building the parameters list before sending
it to the function. This would keep the lib smaller than it is now
because the data structures are no more needed (*_CONF).
* The "standard" Solaris style sounds reasonable, I vote for this (although
we have to rewrite all the current software... :( )
Cheers,
Max
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3088 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://oss-beta1.opensolaris.org/pipermail/kmf-discuss/attachments/20070321/7fe8d8d5/attachment.bin
More information about the kmf-discuss
mailing list