[kmf-discuss] kmf code review (part I.)

[Jan Pechanec]

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Wyllys Ingersoll wrote:

> I disagree with a lot of our cstyle rules.  I don't understand why it should be
> a problem to use a
> negation operator with strlen, the result is obvious.  The semantics of strlen
> (or strcmp either)
> are never going to change.  The internet would probably collapse in a
> smoldering heap if it
> did :)

	sure, and there is always a rule there I don't like. For me it's 
easier to read because I read !x like "x not true" which doesn't make sense 
with strlen() and others. I think that's the reason why it's like that in 
the document because !=0 is "strlen not zero" which is something different.

	anyway, not a big deal...

-- 
Jan Pechanec