Balking about a second <stdio.h> implementation / was: Re: [ksh93-integration-discuss] comments on rev 287 makefiles

[Roland Mainz]

Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
> 
> >if the balking is about ast using sfio instead of stdio (I don't think it is),
> >well, ast+sfio are inseparable
> >we can provide reasons why if anyone needs them
> 
> We do balk at having a second <stdio.h> implementation.

Umpf... these are just a small set of wrappers which call directly into
"sfio". What is exactly the problem here ?

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)