[ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: Planning the final ARC case forthe first ksh93-integration putback...
Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Nov 12 21:31:09 PST 2006
Roland Mainz wrote:
> Sorry for my screaming&&wailing... the complaint/comment was not in your
> direction... the problem is that the OS/Net rules require a "putback
> with no known bugs in the code"
Really? I've never done an ON putback, but I thought it was "no known
significant bugs" (on our priority scale, no Priority 1, 2, or 3 bugs,
but Priority 4 & 5 are allowed - it would be a true acheivement for any
major software to be 100% bug free in any practical amount of time).
Of course, other consolidations have looser rules, so once again, you're
hitting higher obstacles because you fought so hard to go into ON. 8-)
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
More information about the ksh93-integration-discuss
mailing list