[ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: Planning the final ARC caseforthe first ksh93-integration putback...

Glenn Fowler gsf at research.att.com
Tue Nov 14 05:43:13 PST 2006


I have the getconf builtin working except for
	_POSIX_VERSION
	_POSIX2_VERSION
	_XOPEN_VERSION
these are in a strange class because they have the form of static minmax
names but some also have corresponding sysconf() _SC_* ops
in addition, the static values depend on how the application is compiled

ast compiles with the bleeding edge std apis enabled
it seems solaris /usr/bin/getconf compiles with the default

getconf should be resolved by the end of the day

-- Glenn Fowler -- AT&T Research, Florham Park NJ --

On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:20:52 +0100 Roland Mainz wrote:
> Josh Hurst wrote:
> > How to you rate the getconf bug? P1?

> I would rate it somewhere between P2 and P3, however I guess that the
> standards people at Sun will rate it somwwhere at P-"if you don't fix
> this before the initial putback we will skin you alive" :-)

> It just doesn't feel good because I hoped to do a putback in the B51
> timeframe - but it seems this option is now gone thanks to the CTF
> problem... ;-(




More information about the ksh93-integration-discuss mailing list