[osol-arc] Re: [ksh93-integration-discuss] libcmd must die [PSARC-EXT/2006/561 Timeout: 09/05/2006]
Nicolas Williams
Nicolas.Williams at sun.com
Tue Oct 3 07:30:53 PDT 2006
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:50:41PM -0700, Gary Winiger wrote:
> > I'm not sure I know how to parse this.
> >
> > Is the high level message that there is work in progress such that
> > we will have an answer for applications much like SMF is the answer
> > for services, but that answer isn't quite here yet?
> >
> > If I got that right, we can talk about obsoleting /etc/default when
> > that answer is here and somewhat accepted.
>
> I think you've got it right. And, as I said not this case.
> Just motivation for not exposing def*() and my suggestion
> to hide them in a .a until the work was finished.
But you can't do that without re-linking non-ON apps that use def*().
Nico
--
More information about the ksh93-integration-discuss
mailing list