[ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: Project status?

[Mike Kupfer]

>>>>> "April" == April Chin <April.Chin at eng.sun.com> writes:

April> I'm not sure if we need to explicitly track in bugzilla the parts
April> of the process that are a given for any putback (testing, code
April> review, RTI), unless you think it may be useful.

IMO, the main advantage of putting these things into bugs.grommit.com is
that it provides a shared space for you and Roland to track the
remaining tasks--you don't have to worry about keeping private lists in
sync via email.  It also makes the process a little more transparent for
everyone else (many of whom aren't familiar with the process for putting
back into ON).

Note that there is a "tracking" category, which you could use for things
like code review and testing.  Between that and bugzilla's ability to
track dependencies, it looks like you can use bugzilla as a general
project planning tool.  (Too bad it doesn't generate Pert or Gantt
charts.)

But I'm okay either way (use it or not).

cheers,
mike