[ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: /etc/ksh.kshrc for ksh93 [PSARC/2006/587 Timeout: 10/24/2006]

[April Chin]

> X-Original-To: ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org
> Delivered-To: ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org
> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:18:54 -1000 (HST)
> From: Joseph Kowalski <Joseph.Kowalski at eng.sun.com>
> > Interfaces:
> > 
> > Interface	Stability	Description
> > =========       =========	===========
> > /etc/ksh.kshrc	Uncommitted 	Per-system configuration file for
> > 				interactive ksh93 sessions
> 
> This seems a little strange to me.  Would Committed for the file itself
> and format be more appropriate, with the default default of gmacs (or
> whatever) being Uncommitted?  I think reality is that once you ship such
> a file, we are not likely to be able to change its existance or format -
> too many administrators will latch on to it.
> 

I'm okay with the file itself being Committed.  The contents
have some planned future additions, but the default gmacs setting
itself is unlikely to change--I'm fine making the gmacs setting Uncommitted,
as a hedge against a possible change, though.

	April