[ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: /etc/ksh.kshrc for ksh93[PSARC/2006/587 Timeout: 10/24/2006]
Joseph Kowalski
Joseph.Kowalski at eng.sun.com
Wed Oct 18 19:38:17 PDT 2006
> From: Don Cragun <don.cragun at sun.com>
...
> C. If (or when) a case comes forward to replace one or more of
> /sbin/sh, /usr/bin/sh, /usr/bin/ksh, and /usr/xpg4/bin/sh with
> ksh93 we will need to discuss this again as a compatibility
> issue. That discussion should not sidetrack this case. Note
> that /sbin/sh and /usr/bin/sh do not currently provide any
> command line editing options.
I guess I have to disagree here. All along the project team has expressed
a desire for ksh93 to become the one true shell. I believe it is
irresponsible to plant landmines along the project team's roadmap.
Its seems very interesting to me that the project team seems to be the
one planting the mines. 8^)
- jek3
More information about the ksh93-integration-discuss
mailing list