[ksh93-integration-discuss]Re:[osol-code]Roundtwo:((pre-)pre-review)ksh93-integrationwebrev2007-02-02

[Roland Mainz]

Peter Memishian wrote:
>  > >  > >  > ppsym.c => ppsym and probe.sh => probe
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > > In that case, it seems odd to check `probe' in under SCCS control, right?
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Depends... we already have a couple of "intermediate files" (like the
>  > >  > results of the "iffe"-probes) in the tree...
>  > >
>  > > What would one use the checked-in "probe" for?
>  >
>  > In theory it could be used to update the list of CPP symbols set by
>  > default (Ok, it's unlikely that we have to look at this before OS/Net
>  > switches to Sun Studio 12 (and the current codebase compiles with Studio
>  > 12EA without problems (which means there isn't anything we have to worry
>  > about (I've spend the last couple of hours testing that...)))).
> 
> ... and that cannot be done by rebuilding "probe" from the checked-in
> sources?

Yes, that can be done... I added the "probe" scripts on the list of
"files which will be deleted" for the putback (these scripts are on the
border of our little "galaxy" anyway) ...

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)