"findunref"'s exception_list and deleted files... / was: Re: [ksh93-integration-discuss]Re:[osol-code]Roundtwo:((pre-)pre-review)ksh93-integrationwebrev2007-02-02
Peter Memishian
peter.memishian at Sun.COM
Sat Apr 28 20:57:27 PDT 2007
> I've filed and fixed this issue with
> http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204 ("RFE: Update the findunref
> exception_list per pre-pre-review comments and provide a list of
> upstream files which should be deleted from the codebase.") today.
Looks good, thanks!
> Notes:
> 1. "exception_list" got three additional members for the
> ast-ksh.2007-03-28 update:
> -- snip --
> ./lib/libcmd/common/cksum.c
> ./lib/libcmd/common/md5sum.c
> ./lib/libcmd/common/sum.c
> -- snip --
> Right now we can't use these builtins because they depend on libsum.so.1
> (e.g. sum(1) wrapped in alternate library with the option to run other
> algorithms (MD5, SHA1, etc.)) which isn't ARC'ed yet.
Umm, OK. (I presume libsum is also not part of your putback.)
> 2. usr/src/lib/libshell/misc/filelist.txt tracks the files which are
> going to be deleted, either before the putback or (maybe better) do the
> putback in one piece and make a 2nd commit to remove the files listed in
> usr/src/lib/libshell/misc/filelist.txt to make sure they show up in
> deleted_files/ ... that would have the advantage that people who are
> looking for those files can find them in the trashcan...
> ... would that be usefull ?
There's no precedent for doing that, nor do I think it's all that useful
given that deleted_files gets purged at the end of each release train.
--
meem
More information about the ksh93-integration-discuss
mailing list