[ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: [osol-code] ksh93-integration prototype004 2007-01-27 webref+diff

[Peter Memishian]

 > > Roland Mainz writes:
 > > > > > http://www.nrubsig.org/people/gisburn/work/solaris/ksh93_integration/ksh93_integration_prototype004_webrev_20070127/non_ast_files/webrev/
 > > [...]
 > > > > cmd/ast/msgcc/Makefile
 > > > >
 > > > >   56-66: why are these needed?  Don't the default targets work
 > > > >   properly?  The usual way to do this would be:

FWIW, I'm going to wait for this Makefile discussion to reach conclusion
before looking through the updated files.  However, scanning the
responses, I suspect I'm going to make most of the same requests Jim has
made.  In particular, it's incredibly important that ON's existing
Makefile conventions are adhered to when there isn't a compelling reason
to break with them -- where "compelling" means that it really cannot be
reasonably made to work, rather than just personal preference.

--
meem