Minor legal questions about usr/src/lib/libshell/common/data/builtins.c ... / was: Re: [ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: [osol-code] Round two:((pre-)pre-review) ksh93-integrationwebrev 2007-02-02

[David.Comay at Sun.COM]

> AFAIK the only remaining question is whether the following change to the
> AT&T source file "builtins.c"
> (http://www.nrubsig.org/people/gisburn/work/solaris/ksh93_integration/ksh93_integration_prototype004_webrev_20070210/allfiles/webrev/usr/src/lib/libshell/common/data/builtins.c.html)
> requires that we have to put a CDDL license at the top of that file:

Actually, I don't think that's what needs to be asked.

What I suggested asking Bonnie about was whether or not this change
requires a Sun copyright to be added.  I don't believe adding a CDDL
block to the ATT code is appropriate but for ON, we typically add a Sun
copyright to files with "significant" change.  In my book, significant
includes changes necessary to get the file to actually compile but
others may disagree.

dsc