[ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: 2007/035 ksh93 Amendments

[Joseph Kowalski]

James Carlson wrote:
> James Carlson writes:
>   
>> I'm sponsoring this fast-track request on behalf of April Chin and the
>> ksh93 project team.  Please note that this is an *open* case.
>>     
>
> One possible point of concern here is the `getconf' duplication.  This
> project delivers a separate implementation of that feature, so that we
> end up having two (the ksh93 one is a strict superset), and they are
> to be kept in sync by means of additional testing.
>   
I recall a longer term plan would be to have a single implementation of 
this (and
many of the builtin commands).  Is this still the plan and getconf would 
be part
of that?  (Basically, is this duplication a short term expedient?)

- jek3