[ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: |libc::wordexp()| / was: Re: [osol-code] ksh93-integrationprototype004 2007-01-27 webref+diff

[Ian Collins]

Roland Mainz wrote:

>Ian Collins wrote:
>  
>
>>Roland Mainz wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Ian Collins wrote:
>>>
>>>>2 - Are there any unit tests?
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>What do you mean with "unit tests" ?
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Are you serious??
>>    
>>
>
>Erm, yes I am serious since I don't know the exact term "unit tests". I
>am not a native english speaker and try to be carefull before answering
>something completely wrong. With "unit tests" you mean "test suite for
>|wordexp()|", right ?
>
>  
>
OK, sorry.  In my little corner of the software world the term unit
tests is well known and defined.  To answer your question, yes I would
have added a set or suite of tests for |wordexp()| to understand and
document its operation.

>
>  
>
>>>>6 - 109, are multiple variables declared in one line acceptable?
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>cstyle says "yes"... :-)
>>>      
>>>
>>Yuck.
>>    
>>
>
>Why ? Sometimes it's usefull, sometimes it's just ugly. I've seen
>worse... MUCH worse things... =:-)
>  
>
I've yet to see a time when it is useful.

Ian.