[Fwd:[ksh93-integration-discuss]ksh93-integrationpre-reviewround"two"(webrev2007-05-14)]

[Roland Mainz]

Roland Mainz wrote:
> Peter Memishian wrote:
[snip]
> > But why is it inconceivable to have demo files that are ISA-dependent?
> > (The rules should consider the general case, not just ksh93's needs.)
> > /usr/demo already seems to contain a number of ELF binaries.
> 
> Mhhh... in theory it should be possible to use the demo rules in
> usr/src/lib/lib*/$(TRANSMACH)/Makefile or usr/src/lib/lib*/Makefile.com
> , too (however the usage in Makefile.com would affect both 32bit and
> 64bit builds (which may require some additional machinery for building
> only 32bit xor 64bit targets etc.)) ...
> ... should I move the "include Makefile.demo" to
> usr/src/libshell/$(MACH32)/Makefile (AFAIK the rules in
> usr/src/lib/Makefile.lib and usr/src/lib/Makefile.targ should work in
> both cases) ?

As a follow-up: Moving the *DEMO* rules to
usr/src/lib/Makefile.(lib|targ) was a _massive_ mistake. We now have to
deal with lots of breakage in the package database... ;-(

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)