[ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: [osol-code] Round two: ((pre-)pre-review)ksh93-integrationwebrev2007-02-02
Mike Kupfer
mike.kupfer at sun.com
Tue Mar 6 21:17:36 PST 2007
>>>>> "meem" == Peter Memishian <peter.memishian at sun.com> writes:
meem> Renaming them is certainly better than a README, but whether we
meem> rename or remove, we still need to track the list of files that
meem> should have that operation (rename or remove) applied for future
meem> syncs. So why not remove?
The one reason I can think of to keep them is that they provide some
clues about how ksh93 is built using the ATT toolset. So, for example,
if we run into problems, they provide a comparison point. And if the
upstream version changes, the diffs for the ATT makefile may be useful
in constructing the changes to the ON makefile.
mike
More information about the ksh93-integration-discuss
mailing list