[ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: unreferenced files exception_list was Re: [osol-code] Round two:((pre-)pre-review)ksh93-integrationwebrev2007-02-02

[Roland Mainz]

Danek Duvall wrote:
[snip]
> >  # ident        "@(#)exception_list     1.76    06/09/13 SMI"
> > @@ -53,11 +53,18 @@
> >  #
> >  # Ignore everything under trees that may be resynched from outside ON.
> >  #
> > +./src/cmd/ast
> > +./src/cmd/ksh
> >  ./src/cmd/perl
> >  ./src/cmd/svc/configd/sqlite
> >  ./src/cmd/tcpd
> >  ./src/common/openssl
> >  ./src/grub
> > +./src/lib/libast
> > +./src/lib/libcmd
> > +./src/lib/libdll
> > +./src/lib/libpp
> > +./src/lib/libshell
> >  ./src/uts/intel/sys/acpi
> >
> > I'm therefore cc-ing the gatekeepers alias for this...
> >
> > >
> > > Otherwise I can't see how that would be the case, given that we *know* some
> > > of the files being introduced are unreferenced by the build...
> >
> > Yes, this was puzzling to us as well--neither I nor Roland saw
> > anything listed for "unreferenced files" for our nightly builds
> > (with -f option) based on his workspace.
> 
> Yeah, well, that'll do it.  I'm not thrilled by the blanket coverage, even
> with the obvious precedents.

Well, how do the options look like ? If the files start showing up in
the unreferenced file list someone may want to get them ripped-out
sooner or later which ruines our abilty to deploy updates quick&painless
(and I am not thrilled about that idea (and I am not really happy about
the idea that you're unhappy about the current situation (which means I
can only pick the issue why I am unhappy... ;-( Grumpf... ;-( ))).

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)