[ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: [osol-code] Round two:((pre-)pre-review)ksh93-integrationwebrev2007-02-02

[Darren J Moffat]

John Plocher wrote:
> Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:03:19AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
>>> Grumpf...
>> Am I correct in thinking that your concerns around removing these
>> files are entirely a result of a belief that the structure of the code
>> should be optimised for bulk upgrades from an external source base?
>
>
> It sounds like there is/will/reallyshouldbe two different blobs of
> code in the source tree:
>
>     The baseline ATT sources, exactly as delivered by ATT
>
>     and
>
>     A derived set of OpenSolaris source files

That sounds exactly like the SFW model and completely not like the ON 
model.  Given this project is targeting ON (for what ever reason - 
personally I think it might have been more appropriate for SFW but I 
don't know enough of the details so I trust the project teams choice of 
using ON) that is NOT appropriate.

-- 
Darren J Moffat