[ksh93-integration-discuss]Re:[osol-code]Roundtwo:((pre-)pre-review)ksh93-integrationwebrev2007-02-02

[Peter Memishian]

 > >  > ppsym.c => ppsym and probe.sh => probe
 > > 
 > > In that case, it seems odd to check `probe' in under SCCS control, right?
 > 
 > Depends... we already have a couple of "intermediate files" (like the
 > results of the "iffe"-probes) in the tree...

What would one use the checked-in "probe" for?

-- 
meem