[ksh93-integration-discuss]Re:[osol-code]Roundtwo:((pre-)pre-review)ksh93-integrationwebrev2007-02-02

[Peter Memishian]

 > >  > >  > ppsym.c => ppsym and probe.sh => probe
 > >  > >
 > >  > > In that case, it seems odd to check `probe' in under SCCS control, right?
 > >  >
 > >  > Depends... we already have a couple of "intermediate files" (like the
 > >  > results of the "iffe"-probes) in the tree...
 > > 
 > > What would one use the checked-in "probe" for?
 > 
 > In theory it could be used to update the list of CPP symbols set by
 > default (Ok, it's unlikely that we have to look at this before OS/Net
 > switches to Sun Studio 12 (and the current codebase compiles with Studio
 > 12EA without problems (which means there isn't anything we have to worry
 > about (I've spend the last couple of hours testing that...)))).

... and that cannot be done by rebuilding "probe" from the checked-in
sources?

-- 
meem