[ksh93-integration-discuss] Contract for bart(1M) to use libast::fts?
Roland Mainz
roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
Tue May 6 13:45:24 PDT 2008
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Glenn Fowler <gsf at research.att.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 May 2008 20:31:19 -0400 Will Young wrote:
[snip]
> > It does not looks like solaris' libc has anything appropriate, but I
> > see that libast includes ftwalk(3) and beneath that is what looks like a
> > general purpose fts(3) implementation which is what is really needed.
> > (libast is ksh93 project private in PSARC/2006/550)
>
> > I'd like to use fts_open(), fts_read(), etc in my prototype and ask
> > our ARC sponsor to setup a contract for these interfaces if that is
> > agreeable to members of the ksh93 project?
>
> fts has been well burned in, so I don't see any problems from our side
Just asking to be sure: |fts_open()|/|fts_read()|/etc. do not write to
any global variables within libast and is supposed to be threadsafe
assuming each thread manages it's own |FTS *| handle, right ?
----
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
/O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090
(;O/ \/ \O;)
More information about the ksh93-integration-discuss
mailing list