[ksh93-integration-discuss] 2008/344 [ksh93 Integration Update 1 Amendments 1]

[Joseph Kowalski]

Glenn Skinner wrote:
>     Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
>     From: Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith at sun.com>
>     Subject: ksh93 Integration Update 1 Amendments 1 [PSARC/2008/344
> 	    FastTrack timeout 06/03/2008]
>
>     ...
>     ## Part 1.1: Update of ksh93
>     The 1.1 portion of this project is the update of ksh93 from
>     ast-ksh.2007-12-15 to ast-ksh-2008-05-22 which marks the update
>     from ksh93 version 's+' to version 't-' (AST/ksh93 uses the
>     (latin) alphabet for its version number, e.g.  version 'a',
>     version 'b' etc.  ; the '+'/'-' means the stabilty status, e.g.
>     '-' means its "alpha", no suffix means its "stable" (e.g.  ready
>     for production usage) and '+' means its a bugfixed stable version
>     etc.).
>
> Are we to infer from this nomenclature description that ksh's
> stability level is decreasing as part of this case?
>
> 		-- Glenn
>   

I read it as "we don't integrate '-' versions into Solaris".  Did I 
guess right?

- jek3