[ksh93-integration-discuss] 2008/344 [ksh93 Integration Update 1 Amendments 1]

[Roland Mainz]

Glenn Skinner wrote:
> Glenn Skinner wrote:
> > Glenn Skinner wrote:
[snip
> > If the project team wishes to retain the existing stability
> > classification, that's their prerogative; they'll have chosen to
> > assume the risk of violating the stability classification's guarantees
> > (and presumably will have a strategy for mitigating the risk).
> 
> Erm... what does that mean ?
> 
> It means that you can choose to leave ksh's stability classification
> (for ARC purposes) unchanged, and (I think) have done so.  To go along
> with that choice, you've decided that extensive testing is sufficient
> to uphold the guarantees that are implicit in that choice of stability
> level.  (That's the mitigation strategy I was talking about.)
> 
> That's enough to address my concern.

Ok... :-)

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)