[ogb-discuss] Re: [cab-discuss] Re: moving to an ogb discussion list

[Stephen Lau]

Glynn Foster wrote:
> 
> Rich Teer wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Derek Cicero wrote:
>>
>>>> I was wondering if we'd leave that as historical record or just move it to
>>>> a historical section under the OGB community.
>>> Any final thoughts on this? Delete and redirect or archive?
>> I'd be inclined to keep the CAB stuff available, for posterities sake,
>> with a note that the OGB is now the correct place to look for current
>> info.
> 
> I'd prefer for the information to stay with the old 'CAB' community, with a
> historical section detailing the rough history of the CAB, and where the
> previous pages are. It would be less cluttered for the new OGB pages, but I'd
> obviously worry that most people are aware of the CAB pages and wouldn't think
> to look at the OGB pages.

A big honkin' orange box at the top which said something to the effect 
of "CAB is dead.  Long live the OGB." or something to that effect should 
suffice.

-steve

(bonus points if you work in the Highlander quote, "There can be only one")

-- 
stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development