[advocacy-discuss] Re: [ogb-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] Logo/Mascot for OpenSolaris

[Jim Grisanzio]

Darren.Reed at Sun.COM wrote:

> The model that I envisage of how it should work is:
> - ogb asks advocacy to go and do this


But earlier the Advocacy CG didn't exit. Now it does? It doesn't matter, 
anyway. There is no role here for the OGB.


> - advocacy goes and does it, comes back with a result


It doesn't work that way. If you want a logo and you want Advocacy to 
lead the process (which seems most logical given the make up of the 
community), you ought to participate in the process along with everyone. 
That's not reflected in your earlier remarks. And ultimately, all of the 
OpenSolaris community gets a say in one way or another, for that matter 
(pending any legal/trademark issues, etc).


> - ogb says "thank you" and gives it a stamp of approval.


What would they stamp?


> In other words, the advocacy group does all of the "hard work"
> but it should still need to be ratified by the OGB.


Why?


Jim
-- 
Jim Grisanzio http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris