[ogb-discuss] Device Driver Community
Alan DuBoff
alan.duboff at sun.com
Thu May 3 12:33:15 PDT 2007
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Yes. Although, its important that Max's work actually be accurate. I've not
> reviewed his info, so I don't know whether it is or not.
I think that Max's work is accurate, and he's taught many classes at SunU
on writing device drivers...for that matter Alta Elstad is the one who
re-worked "Writing Device Drivers".
> Correct. But in theory we could have our own child gate, with our own
> putback rules, although ultimately getting anything from _that_ gate into
> Nevada would have to follow Nevada rules.
>
> I'm not sure I see a lot of merit in having a child gate though.
We definitely don't need our own gate, far from it. I only want to see
some control over the actual code that gets putback, from our community
before it goes to ARC and/or c-team, or however that will work in
OpenSolaris as a community.
--
Alan DuBoff - Solaris x86 IHV/OEM Group
More information about the ogb-discuss
mailing list