[ogb-discuss] Handling of job postings
Keith M Wesolowski
keith.wesolowski at sun.com
Fri May 4 11:19:56 PDT 2007
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:56:46AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I'd be more concerned with finding a couple of committed moderators *at all*;
> note that nobody has yet volunteered. I don't really think with this kind of
> list that bias is a serious danger as long as we don't make a professional
> recruiter or job-hungry consultant the moderator.
I'll volunteer. If this becomes a major time sink then it's not
working the way we intend it to anyway.
> I think that all positions should be OK; if we limit it to kernel hacking then
> we're liable to only see 10 posts a year. Again, for reference we get about
> 5-6 posts per week on postgresql-jobs. I don't expect traffic to be a real
> problem.
You might be underestimating the enormous number of administration
positions out there that are part-Solaris (where that means anything
from working with Solaris most of the time to "they have a machine
running Solaris 2.5.1 in a different department you might pass once a
year on your way to another Windows emergency"). Or maybe I'm
overestimating the number of people who would post them to one of
these lists.
> I think the one real question is whether we want to make the list "principals
> only" or whether we want to let recruiters post. We let recruiters post at
> postgresql.org, but there's been discussion a couple of times about
> prohibiting them because of one bait-and-switch recruiter.
Given the way most companies hire these days, principals-only seems
unlikely to yield anything other than a handful of opportunities at
small companies.
> From my perspective, a good jobs board helps grow the community, because it
> allows hobby contributors to find FTE in opensolaris and then increase the
> volume of their contributions. So we should do our best to encourage this.
Agreed.
I also think John's suggesting of splitting the list might be a
reasonable compromise, although we'll need to be very diligent in
making sure posts are categorised properly. An actual searchable
database would be far more useful, whether our own or at a partner's
site.
--
Keith M Wesolowski "Sir, we're surrounded!"
FishWorks "Excellent; we can attack in any direction!"
More information about the ogb-discuss
mailing list