[ogb-discuss] Advocacy Community Proposal

[Glynn Foster]

James Carlson wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith writes:
>> Glynn Foster wrote:
>>> This is silly - it's stopping progress being made, we need to change that in my
>>> opinion. While I agree we shouldn't come to a decision if the majority of OGB
>>> members are away from mail or there are enough open issues that need answering,
>>> but I'm not sure I see we have that problem with this proposal right now.
>> Calling a meeting this week to vote on it would progress this case.
>>
>> Long term, do we want to propose a constitutional amendment to make
>> the e-mail decision making system more like what we originally thought
>> it was than the current "100% affirmative votes required" system?
> 
> I'd be ok with that.  I think having a lower overhead route for
> non-controversial matters makes sense.  In this particular case, I
> don't see anything that's problematic about the community
> consolidation, so I think it's a fairly good idea to have an email
> vote.

Sounds good to me - I agree with Jim's proposal, and very much like to see it
being implemented (with Ben's outstanding suggestions included).


Glynn