[ogb-discuss] please dissolve the Desktop Community
Brandorr
brandorr at opensolaris.org
Fri Nov 2 14:38:04 PDT 2007
On 11/2/07, Shawn Walker <swalker at opensolaris.org> wrote:
> On 02/11/2007, Roy T. Fielding <fielding at gbiv.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 2, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Glynn Foster wrote:
> > > Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > >> 1) Inform all three of Indiana's sponsoring communities about the
> > >> release
> > >> plans requirement of the constitution.
> > >
> > > Awesome, yet another way of slowing down getting software to our
> > > users. Anything
> > > else we can do to get in the way?
> >
> > If you had initiated the project within a community that was scoped
> > for building a distribution, then that decision would have been made
> > already and by the very same people who did the work to produce the
> > software.
> >
> > I told you this at the time the project was proposed, and you ignored
> > it to satisfy the immediate desire of the internal marketing team
> > at Sun. Don't blame anyone else for these problems -- they are
> > entirely manufactured by your refusal to accept community input from
> > day one, and they will continue until the organization reflects the
> > reality of how you intend to govern this project (one way or another).
>
> Sorry, but that's wrong. There is currently nothing in the
> constitution that stipulates that projects must live under a certain
> community. Your claim otherwise is surprising given you drafted the
> constitution.
Shawn go read the glossary. He isn't talking about a CG (Community
Group). He is talking about a community as in the "OpenSolaris
community". (Which is not a distro building community), vs. the
"Debian Community", which was a community scoped and formed around
building a distro called GNU/Linux. (Like Slackware).
Basically Ian is trying to name a distro with the name of an existing
community, vs naming a community after the name of the distro they are
building.
> --
> Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
> http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
>
> "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all
> junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics
> are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall
> _______________________________________________
> ogb-discuss mailing list
> ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss
>
--
- Brian Gupta
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/
More information about the ogb-discuss
mailing list