[ogb-discuss] please dissolve the Desktop Community

[Brandorr]

On 11/2/07, Brandorr <brandorr at opensolaris.org> wrote:
> On 11/2/07, Shawn Walker <swalker at opensolaris.org> wrote:
> > On 02/11/2007, Brandorr <brandorr at opensolaris.org> wrote:
> > > On 11/2/07, Shawn Walker <swalker at opensolaris.org> wrote:
> > > > On 02/11/2007, Roy T. Fielding <fielding at gbiv.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Nov 2, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Glynn Foster wrote:
> > > > > > Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > > > > >> 1) Inform all three of Indiana's sponsoring communities about the
> > > > > >> release
> > > > > >>    plans requirement of the constitution.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Awesome, yet another way of slowing down getting software to our
> > > > > > users. Anything
> > > > > > else we can do to get in the way?
> > > > >
> > > > > If you had initiated the project within a community that was scoped
> > > > > for building a distribution, then that decision would have been made
> > > > > already and by the very same people who did the work to produce the
> > > > > software.
> > > > >
> > > > > I told you this at the time the project was proposed, and you ignored
> > > > > it to satisfy the immediate desire of the internal marketing team
> > > > > at Sun.  Don't blame anyone else for these problems -- they are
> > > > > entirely manufactured by your refusal to accept community input from
> > > > > day one, and they will continue until the organization reflects the
> > > > > reality of how you intend to govern this project (one way or another).
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, but that's wrong. There is currently nothing in the
> > > > constitution that stipulates that projects must live under a certain
> > > > community. Your claim otherwise is surprising given you drafted the
> > > > constitution.
> > >
> > > Shawn go read the glossary. He isn't talking about a CG (Community
> > > Group). He is talking about a community as in the "OpenSolaris
> > > community". (Which is not a distro building community), vs. the
> > > "Debian Community", which was a community scoped and formed around
> > > building a distro called GNU/Linux. (Like Slackware).
> >
> > Sorry; I don't agree with your interpretation.
> >
> > > Basically Ian is trying to name a distro with the name of an existing
> > > community, vs naming a community after the name of the distro they are
> > > building.
> >
> > Sorry, I don't agree. The community may have the name, but it does not
> > hold any rights to it nor exclusive usage of it. There already
> > distributions using the name in other ways; shall I accuse them of
> > attempting to represent us?
>
> Are they using the Trademark in such a way that implys that they are
> "representing us"?

BTW, it seems in hindsight that SolarisSource.org would have been a
much better name for this community. ;) (Hint, Hint)

>
> > --
> > Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
> > http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
> >
> > "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all
> > junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics
> > are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall
> >
>
>
> --
> - Brian Gupta
>
> http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/
>


-- 
- Brian Gupta

http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/