[ogb-discuss] Proposal: Promote the Website project to a Community

Alan Burlison Alan.Burlison at sun.com
Tue Nov 27 15:16:25 PST 2007


Simon Phipps wrote:

> The proposal below looks good to me, especially since it also answers 
> Roy's very reasonable issues with the proposed OGB Committee. I suggest 
> the Content project also be endorsed by Advocacy since there is a clear 
> functional relationship.

Mike Kupfer wrote:

> Would it work to have a Content project that is overseen by multiple
> Community Groups?

Which seems eminently sensible to me.  Perhaps the initial Project 
membership should be drawn from members of bot the existing Website 
Project and the Advocacy Community Group?

JimG also pointed out to me that the Documentation CG already has a 
Content project [1], so there is a name clash if not also a scope clash. 
  The main aim of the existing Content project seems to be to produce 
content for both 'external' articles and the website.  I'm not sure that 
this is the same as my proposed Content project - the existing Content 
project seems focused on providing material, my proposed project is more 
to do with the management of any such content.  Perhaps I should rename 
my proposed "Content" project to "Editorial"?

[1] http://opensolaris.org/os/project/content/

-- 
Alan Burlison
--


More information about the ogb-discuss mailing list