[ogb-discuss] Community Group Guidelines, v0.2

[Nicholas Solter]

Glynn,

I agree that this seems awfully specific to be enshrined in the 
constitution. Any hope of changing it? Was does it take to ratify a 
constitutional amendment?

Thanks,
Nick

Glynn Foster wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> Nicholas Solter wrote:
>> Hi Glynn,
>>
>> Thanks for working on this much-needed document. I sent you a few 
>> comments a while back that I'm not sure I see reflected here. See 
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-July/002108.html
>>
>> My general point is that the constitution seems to require consensus 
>> voting for project instantiation and core contributor grants, while your 
>> wording implies that community groups have more leeway in that area. For 
>> example, you refer to "suggested" voting procedures, while my reading of 
>> the constitution is that they are required.
> 
> Having read through the constitution, looks like you are right.	I'll try and
> rewrite the effected sections (though I think this somewhat contrary to the
> spirit of wanting the community groups to govern themselves).
> 
> "Actions requiring a vote shall have a voting period of no less than seventy-two
> (72) hours." - Hooray for stop energy! ;)
> 
> 
> Glynn
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ogb-discuss mailing list
> ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss

-- 
Nicholas Solter, Solaris Cluster Development
http://blogs.sun.com/nsolter