[ogb-discuss] Community Group Guidelines, v0.2

[Brandorr]

On 9/18/07, Nicholas Solter <Nicholas.Solter at sun.com> wrote:
> Glynn,
>
> I agree that this seems awfully specific to be enshrined in the
> constitution. Any hope of changing it? Was does it take to ratify a
> constitutional amendment?

I don't know if it is worth the effort to change the constitution,
when everyone seems happy with the status quo. (I think)

-Brian

> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> Glynn Foster wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Nicholas Solter wrote:
> >> Hi Glynn,
> >>
> >> Thanks for working on this much-needed document. I sent you a few
> >> comments a while back that I'm not sure I see reflected here. See
> >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-July/002108.html
> >>
> >> My general point is that the constitution seems to require consensus
> >> voting for project instantiation and core contributor grants, while your
> >> wording implies that community groups have more leeway in that area. For
> >> example, you refer to "suggested" voting procedures, while my reading of
> >> the constitution is that they are required.
> >
> > Having read through the constitution, looks like you are right.       I'll try and
> > rewrite the effected sections (though I think this somewhat contrary to the
> > spirit of wanting the community groups to govern themselves).
> >
> > "Actions requiring a vote shall have a voting period of no less than seventy-two
> > (72) hours." - Hooray for stop energy! ;)
> >
> >
> > Glynn
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ogb-discuss mailing list
> > ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss
>
> --
> Nicholas Solter, Solaris Cluster Development
> http://blogs.sun.com/nsolter
> _______________________________________________
> ogb-discuss mailing list
> ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss
>


-- 
- Brian Gupta

http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/