[ogb-discuss] Proposal: Project instantiation update

[John Plocher]

Glynn Foster wrote:
> [resending, got the address wrong the first time]
> 
> John Plocher wrote:
>> I didn't define it (because it is defined in section 7.5 of the Constitution);
>> they show up here in 2.2:
> 
> Duh, completely missed that - though I wonder what proportion of either the
> Facilitator or the project proposer mail the Project Herald in reality? To some
> extents (given the information that the Project Herald typically needs), it
> makes a lot more sense for it to be the latter.


Could be, but coming from the facilitator makes it a bit more official.
I don't care one way or the other (or both) - anything is better than
the current wording :-)

    -John