[ogb-discuss] Project proposal - Integration (MFI driver for LSI network chipsets)
Alan DuBoff
alan.duboff at sun.com
Tue Jan 8 00:10:35 PST 2008
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, James C. McPherson wrote:
> What we have with mfi is the situation where LSI's "oh we're really
> truly going to give you this source real soon now" has taken, more
> than 12 months (as far as I'm aware).
>
> How can *any* organisation think that this is useful to the people
> who purchase their kit?
James,
I'll eply to your message, there's a bunch of them to wade through in this
thread, but you were the one that derived this as you are somehow related
to submitting some type of ARC case for the author.
I did find out about the megasas driver, and it's license.
I also asked my manager if he would reply to this thread, but I think it
is remotely possible that he will, I will pass along what I found out from
him.
Just before Xmas the agreement was received, signed by LSI to get the
driver putback, and this was about the time this thread started.
The LSI driver is open source, I do not know exactly what license it is
under, but the driver portion is all distributable source. There are some
pieces that are not open, but those are the management utilities, and it
is up to Sun/LSI in how those are made available to the community. Since
LSI is the maintainer of those sources, they will most likely have the
biggest say, but I am not clear on how the roles are defined, or who did
the actual work. It is done under contract/nda between Sun/LSI, even
though the driver is being open sourced.
You will see this putback within the next month I'm told, as of just
before Xmas, it is final.
> Whatever distros are out there will *all* have to deal with the
> concept and problem of handling changes which move from one driver
> to another, and how to make that happen in as pain-free a fashion
> as possible.
I wonder how that will work for more than one of the same driver in open
source? It should be able to handle more than one driver to support a
given device also, and the user should be able to select which one they
use. Or it should be handled by specific distributions in which drivers
they package for a given device, and a distribution could elect to devise
a system that would allow for more than one driver for the same device I
'spose. That would give the user an alternative driver, in this case the
mfi could be offered along with he megasas driver.
--
Alan DuBoff - Solaris x86 IHV/OEM Group
More information about the ogb-discuss
mailing list