[ogb-discuss] Ben's Agenda Items for Jan 23rd, 2008

[Casper.Dik at Sun.COM]

>Ben Rockwood wrote:
>> Item 4: Main Motion (benr03), language follows: 'In the best interest of 
>> full disclosure and transparency with the community at large which we 
>> represent; I resolve that the ogb-private email list be opened to public 
>> view; existing archived messages created prior to the adoption of this 
>> resolution shall be exempt as the authors interacted without the 
>> expectation of public review.  The archive shall, therefore, be 
>> destroyed and henceforth public.'
>
>If you're going to make it public, why not just destroy it?   What's the
>purpose of a public ogb-private list separate from ogb-discuss or the
>previously discussed ogb-business?

And I'll  -1 it in advance.

There are lots of things we cannot discuss in the open; any discussion 
about persons for one.

Full disclosure is not always in the best interest of all concerned.

Casper