[ogb-discuss] Ben's Agenda Items for Jan 23rd, 2008

[Doug Scott]

Ben Rockwood wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>   
>> Ben Rockwood wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Item 4: Main Motion (benr03), language follows: 'In the best interest of 
>>> full disclosure and transparency with the community at large which we 
>>> represent; I resolve that the ogb-private email list be opened to public 
>>> view; existing archived messages created prior to the adoption of this 
>>> resolution shall be exempt as the authors interacted without the 
>>> expectation of public review.  The archive shall, therefore, be 
>>> destroyed and henceforth public.'
>>>     
>>>       
>> If you're going to make it public, why not just destroy it?   What's the
>> purpose of a public ogb-private list separate from ogb-discuss or the
>> previously discussed ogb-business?
>>   
>>     
>
> Should the above motion fail, that would be the next step.  The result 
> is the same, where then just debating the most appropriate name for the 
> list, "business" or "internal" or whatever instead of "private".  I'm 
> fine with that.  If others agree I'll modify my motion to include such a 
> naming change.
>
> benr.
> _______________________________________________
>   
Ben,
  I think your proposal actually requires changes to sections 6.7 (for 
the OGB) and 7.10 (for CG's) of the constitution.

Doug