[ogb-discuss] RFC: Emancipation Community
Simon Phipps
webmink at sun.com
Mon May 12 21:37:43 PDT 2008
On May 12, 2008, at 15:13, Peter Tribble wrote:
> Hm. I thought the pressure was to completely restructure, not to
> creatively reinterpret the constitution regarding CGs - which really
> need to be rethought entirely.
Rewriting everything assumes we have experts amongst us and also
assumes we can wait a year or so for everything to be re-invented and
then voted upon by the community. I don't believe either of those to
be true; instead, it would probably tear us apart. Consequently we are
better off indulging in as little YAGNI-work as possible.
I think the community we've ended up with can be described using the
terms and shapes in the existing constitution. Although (as some are
keen to point out) we aren't living it exactly, we are sufficiently
shaped by it to not need a full rewrite. I believe we can pull the two
towards each other.
I am keen to explore here how we can make carefully targeted
interpretations that allow us to "draw a pencil line round the
community" as I put it last weekend. We can then if necessary amend
the constitution to reflect our practice.
S.
More information about the ogb-discuss
mailing list