[ogb-discuss] Power Management Community Proposal

[John Plocher]

Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> If it's not clear that a group should be a CG under the 
> current system, let's address /that/ issue now and not just make a group 
> into a CG only to have to change them in, say, six months, into 
> something that they may not want. Working in parallel is fine if a 
> group's request obviously fits the current system.

Absolutely +1 - I hope I didn't imply that we were throwing out the current
rules and would approve CGs willy nilly, 'cuz that's just not the case.

   -John