[ogb-discuss] Power Management Community Proposal

[Jim Grisanzio]

John Plocher wrote:
> Jim Grisanzio wrote:
>   
>> If it's not clear that a group should be a CG under the 
>> current system, let's address /that/ issue now and not just make a group 
>> into a CG only to have to change them in, say, six months, into 
>> something that they may not want. Working in parallel is fine if a 
>> group's request obviously fits the current system.
>>     
>
> Absolutely +1 - I hope I didn't imply that we were throwing out the current
> rules and would approve CGs willy nilly, 'cuz that's just not the case.
>   

Ok, that's fine. I'm clear now. Thanks.

Jim

-- 
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/