LSARC 2007/299 - Berkeley Database 4.5.20 - fast-track

[Karen Langford]

John Plocher wrote:
> Rob Stephens wrote:
>>> Is there any architectural content to this case?
>> Karen- If we did not include the arch doc.. please include the
>> one from the 4.2 case.  It has not changed.
>
>
> If I interpret your comments correctly, you are saying that this
> project is not making any architectural changes whatsoever.
>
> If that is so (i.e., no publicly usable interfaces were added,
> deleted or changed and the behavior of BDB.new is effectively
> the same as BDB.old), then what actions or deliverables do you
> expect the Architecture Review process to do here? (i.e., you
> make it sound like this should have been a simple self-review)
We were looking to ARC for guidance on how to deliver both the new and
old library( included for customers not upgrading to the new one). ARC 
advised
us re this issue during our preinception meeting. We incorporated ARC's 
advice and
are now looking for closure on our case.

Thanks,
Karen
>
>   -John
>