Intel AMT [PSARC/2007/601 Self Review

[Mark A. Carlson]

Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>
> ...
>
> As far as interfaces go, the HTTP/SOAP interfaces are "AMT project 
> private" in normal ARC parlance, or, at worst, they could be called 
> Volatile. Software on the host doesn't normally talk to them (unless the 
> management software is ported to Solaris. Note that that would be the 
> subject of another ARC case, and is not treated here.)
Is this case exporting the WS-Management capability?

Wouldn't we want external third party management application to be able 
to use that?

-- mark