Fwd: Unencumbered libdisasm for Sparc [PSARC/2007/507 Self Review]

[James Carlson]

Darren J Moffat writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > Using that binding means "Nevada only" for now, the same as a Minor
> > release binding.
> 
> I don't see why it is confusing.  To me that says that is is low risk 

It's confusing because many project teams use "Micro" by mistake when
they actually mean "Patch."  We then run into last-minute updates when
the C-team calls them on it.  It's almost always an error.

I have no problem with "Micro" when used correctly -- though it's
slightly odd when there are no Micro vehicles around and none
contemplated -- but the chance of error seems high.

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive         71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677