Fwd: Unencumbered libdisasm for Sparc [PSARC/2007/507 Self Review]

[James C. McPherson]

James Carlson wrote:
> Darren J Moffat writes:
>> James Carlson wrote:
>>> Using that binding means "Nevada only" for now, the same as a Minor
>>> release binding.
>> I don't see why it is confusing.  To me that says that is is low risk 
> 
> It's confusing because many project teams use "Micro" by mistake when
> they actually mean "Patch."  We then run into last-minute updates when
> the C-team calls them on it.  It's almost always an error.
> 
> I have no problem with "Micro" when used correctly -- though it's
> slightly odd when there are no Micro vehicles around and none
> contemplated -- but the chance of error seems high.

Following up on your and Bill's question, we're requesting
a Minor binding for the rfe.


Are there any other issues or questions that we need to
address with this RFE - at least from PSARC's point of view?


thankyou in advance,
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems