[clearview-discuss] 2007/527 Addendum for Clearview Vanity Naming and Nemo Unification

[Peter Memishian]

 > There are other dimensions besides GLDv3 driver support -- e.g., Crossbow
 > will make use of the Vanity Naming feature to provide administratively
 > chosen names for VNICs.  Also if we didn't backport UV, the GLDv3
 > codebases for S10 and Nevada would become significantly different, which
 > also greatly impacts Crossbow (since the Crossbow S10 backport would
 > become more of a reimplementation than a backport -- with commensurate
 > impact on testing).

BTW, this all seems off-topic for this PSARC case.

-- 
meem