[clearview-discuss] 2007/527 Addendum for Clearview Vanity Naming and Nemo Unification

[Cathy Zhou]

John Plocher wrote:
> Kais Belgaied wrote:
>> Ah! in this case, it seems just an internal interface between Nemo and 
>> itself. If that's true then it's an implemetnation choice and shouldn't be
>> exposed to device driver writers as part of the MAC_CAPAB* interface 
>> maturing to soon become committed, and the case can just be withdrawn as 
>> it turns out to be below the radar for an ARC review.
> 
> 
> Probably better to change it to closed approved automatic - the project
> isn't being withdrawn, it /is/ going into the product, it just doesn't
> need the ARCs to do anything formal along the way :-)
> 
Please be noted that other than the MAC_CAPAB_NO_NATIVEVLAN interface, this 
case also proposed other interfaces (DLIOCMARGININFO ioctl, m_margin etc.) 
that would be exposed to the device drivers.

Thanks
- Cathy