LSARC/2008/059 - SQLite

[Nicolas Williams]

On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:51:37PM -0500, James Carlson wrote:
> Brian Cameron writes:
> > I believe the main reason the JDS team wants these interfaces to be
> > Volatile is so that other Sun groups that wish to depend on the
> > interfaces sign contracts with us.  This way the JDS team can manage
> 
> In that case, make them either Project or Consolidation Private.
> That'll result in the most difficulty for other projects, as they'll
> all need contracts.

Brian was right though: Volatile is "public and unstable for folks
outside the WOS" and "consolidation private for better-than-volatile
consumers in the WOS" (my rough translation of what the taxonomy says).
I still think it's better to go with Uncommitted, but I'll live.

I would prefer if the docs were included, I'd still like to understand
the library version number.