Opinion for Review: PSARC 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris (02/28/2008)

[Mark A. Carlson]

Garret,

If, in your opinion, you find any inception issues
(even if they were resolved) that other projects
can learn from, please include the issue and it's
resolution in the opinion.

Thanks,

-- mark

Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Gary Winiger wrote:
>>> 4.  Opinion
>>>
>>> No issues were raised for the  project  team  at  commitment
>>> review.
>>>     
>>
>>     There seemed to be issues discussed at the inception review.
>>     Were none of them worthy enough to note in the opinion?
>>     
>> Gary..
>>   
>
> There were issues at inception, indeed.  They had all been resolved 
> before commitment though.  I am uncertain what the procedure is for 
> noting issues that are resolved before a project comes for commitment 
> -- certainly there was no advice or discussion at commitment.
>
> Put another way, I _thought_ that the opinion does not stand alone, 
> but exists in conjunction with the case materials.  Those case 
> materials (the commitment versions) had, I presume, been found 
> acceptable without need or desire for change.  So I called out a 
> reference to them, and didn't mention it further.
>
> Admittedly, I'm still new to the process here, but if there is 
> something else that folks would like this opinion to reflect, I'm 
> happy to change it.  In such a case, though, I'd like to have a little 
> more guidance as to what should or should not be recorded in the opinion.
>
>    -- Garrett